#What are hubologists after Pc
#What are hubologists after free

Enter the Brotherhood base, loot it, and get all ops you can now at the computer. The latter part works fine to a point as far as getting people to believe foolish things, but it's not enough to convince people of things that directly contradict overwhelming, obvious and immediately available evidence and personal experience.4 Powerful: The Nuka-World Raiders In San Francisco, the Chosen One has the option of aiding the Hubologists in their mad schemes or eliminating them as part of a Shi mission. The art of lying is really just the art of concealing the fact that you're being deceptive, as well as discouraging the other person from thinking it through too much. The best liar in all of history could not convince you that you're dry toast unless you happen to be insane already yourself, or else under the influence of mind-altering chemicals.

or that you're touched in the head.Д®dit: The reason I'd do it this way is lying simply isn't mind-control. Now you have a person who thinks you're either being fooled by some kind of magical illusion. That means that if your lie is ridiculous and obviously false (i.e., 'You are dry toast'), the person won't suddenly say, 'Oh gosh, I'm dry toast!' However, he might conclude that you honestly believe that he is. In short, I'd personally rule that the only thing a successful Bluff check can guarantee is that the other person doesn't believe you're intentionally lying. I think in some cases, it's valid for even a successful Bluff check on a really outlandish lie to produce only an extremely limited success, wherein the person doesn't actually believe the obviously untrue lie, but she believes that you really believe it (because your Bluff check was so good, you appeared completely sincere).

#What are hubologists after Pc

(Of course, when a PC does this in response to being bluffed by an NPC, it's called metagaming.

#What are hubologists after free

Again, this isn't something a DM should do unless the PCs are being really stupid (bluffing someone to believe that the sky is green will, realistically, only work until they look outside, say, unless you have a more convoluted explaination for what they seem to see) but a PC is free to suddenly realize the truth whenever they want, although it might make other players and the DM angry at them if they're doing it really blatantly. I'm greedy like that.' In other words, while the DM is supposed to play NPCs 'realistically' and have them react realistically based on their beliefs, PCs are under no obligation to do so if they don't want to - it's bad roleplaying, generally, and it's more than a little rude and meta-gamish for them to do, but it's pretty rude for a PC to bluff other PCs in the first place unless you have a PVP game or something.ДЄlso, nothing in the Bluff text says that they can't realize the truth six seconds after you successfully bluff them. However, PCs are still in control of their character (and as the text says, Bluff is not a suggestion spell.) If you bluff them into believing they owe you money, they're perfectly entitled to say 'Well, my character decides not to pay it.' If you bluff them into thinking the treasure belongs to you, they're perfectly entitled to say 'Fine, I believe it, but I take it anyway, even though I believe it's all yours. But other skills, like Bluff (and Intimidate) don't.

Diplomacy specifically says it's not for use on players. Possibility of getting your fellow players incredibly angry aside, are you technically allowed to Bluff fellow PCs?Sort of.